Topic · Themes
Philosophy and ethics: all our articles
All 97 Alyriaz articles on the “Philosophy and ethics” topic: news, analysis and explainers, newest first. To stay up to date, you can get an alert as soon as a new article on this topic is published.

Can an AI be neutral?
AI systems are regularly criticised for being politically or culturally biased. But is perfect neutrality even possible for a system trained on human texts and shaped by human choices? We examine where biases originate, and why transparency may be better than the promised neutrality.
Does AI make us stupider? What the studies actually say
Several studies link heavy AI use to a decline in critical thinking, a phenomenon known as cognitive offloading. We examine what this research actually shows, its methodological limitations, and the most useful takeaway: learning without AI before turning to it appears to be protective.
Your password manager has just handed the keys to an AI. Should you be worried?
In mid-July 2026, 1Password launched an integration allowing Claude to connect to your accounts without your passwords ever reaching the model. We explain the mechanism, why it is genuinely well designed, and why it does not address the most important question: what the agent does once connected.
Do we still need to learn to code in 2026?
AI models now write professional-grade code and top certain rankings ahead of the best closed models. Does that mean learning to program is no longer worth it? We honestly examine both sides, and explain why the real question isn't whether to learn, but what to learn.
"AGI", that magic word we're promised without ever being defined.
AGI, artificial general intelligence: the term is touted as the Holy Grail of AI, yet no one agrees on its definition. We explore what these three letters really cover, the mix of science and marketing, and the philosophical question they raise about the very nature of intelligence.
Can you love an AI? And if so, is that a problem?
As China shuts down its AI companions, a universal question emerges: can you form a real bond with an artificial intelligence, and is it healthy? We explore, without judgement, what these relationships fill, what they risk replacing, and where to draw the line between comfort and dependence.
Teaching an AI to be "good": the hardest problem in the entire industry
Every AI model card system talks about alignment, undesirable behaviours, deception rates. Behind this technical vocabulary lies one of the deepest problems posed by modern AI: how to ensure that a system we only partially understand actually does what we want.
What if AI ends up poisoning itself?
Model collapse describes what happens when an AI trains on content generated by other AIs: a gradual impoverishment, like a photocopy of a photocopy. A recent study revives the concern. We explore the phenomenon and the philosophical question it raises: can an intelligence that feeds only on itself still learn?
Talking to the dead through AI: the industry that sparks debate
In August 2025, journalist Jim Acosta interviewed live on CNN the AI avatar of Joaquin Oliver, a victim of the 2018 Parkland shooting at the age of 17. His parents had given their permission. The avatar spoke with his verbal tics, his political opinions, his voice. Viewers were in shock. Welcome to the industry that is trying to rethink death.
What if AI paradoxically made us more human?
There is much talk of what AI will take from us. There is little talk of what it might, paradoxically, give back. Here is the angle no outlet really digs into: what if the machine, by becoming excellent at the quantifiable, forced us to rediscover what is not? Cautious optimism, concrete observations.
Why are we starting to talk to AIs like they're friends?
The phenomenon doesn't affect other people. It affects you, perhaps already without your having really noticed. You type a personal problem into a ChatGPT window and you really listen to the answer. You call it "asking an AI for advice". But it's something else. It's probably the deepest conversation many people will have had this week.
How do we recognise a human work when AI paints, writes and composes just as well?
For the first time in history, we can no longer tell whether a work was created by a human. This uncertainty is not trivial. It calls into question what art itself is, what we look for when we listen to it, look at it, read it. And perhaps, by contrast, what we look for in our own lives.
What if AI finally forced us to answer a question we have avoided for 200 years: what is work for?
Throughout human history, work has almost always been synonymous with survival. With AI, that link is starting to break. For the first time, we can imagine a society in which humans no longer work in order to live. What seemed utopian is becoming conceivable. And suddenly, a dizzying question resurfaces: if we no longer have to work, what do we want to do with our lives?
What are we passing on to our children when AI already knows everything?
For the first time in human history, parents are passing on to their children skills that a machine already performs better than they do. Reading, writing, arithmetic, memorising: the machine wins. So what? Few people dare to ask this question directly. And yet it is probably the most important one of our age.
The ghost workers of AI: who really pays the price of ChatGPT
Every time ChatGPT answers you without showing you shocking images, it is because someone, somewhere in Nairobi or Manila, has spent their day looking at those images to train the filter. Paid less than 2 dollars an hour. This is the invisible-labour industry that makes AI possible.
Is AI conscious? Why researchers no longer dare to say no
In our previous article, we explained technically how AI works, and we asked a dizzying question: if we cannot prove our own consciousness, and a "lifeless" tool reproduces our emotions to perfection, does the difference really exist? Here is what the researchers who are seriously asking themselves this question in 2026 think.
"By the end of 2026, we'll laugh at today's AIs"
OpenAI's boss said it publicly in early April: today's best models will look ridiculous by Christmas. This is not marketing. It is a trend affecting the whole industry, and it raises a far deeper question.
Other topics in “Themes”
- AI agents77 articles
- Code and developers22 articles
- Images and video20 articles
- Voice and music15 articles
- Robots and self-driving cars9 articles
- Health15 articles
- School and education16 articles
- Jobs and work34 articles
- Laws and regulation59 articles
- Cybersecurity32 articles
- Safety and risks51 articles
- Privacy and data45 articles
- Disinformation and deepfakes34 articles
- Energy and climate15 articles
- Chips and data centers40 articles
- Research and science43 articles
- Money and markets53 articles
- AI prices and costs43 articles
- Geopolitics and sovereignty58 articles
- Open source and local AI44 articles
- Culture and creativity42 articles
- Everyday life32 articles
- Understanding AI122 articles
- Benchmarks and comparisons30 articles